Rename sub-package eksd.unix → eksd/unix

This seems to be more common? In any case, ASDF
doesn’t complain about this format.
This commit is contained in:
Jaidyn Ann 2024-05-27 22:38:14 -05:00
parent b60858498c
commit b0d3aa2300
3 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ quicklisp:
build:
$(LISP) --load eksd.asd \
--eval '(ql:quickload :eksd)' \
--eval '(ql:quickload :eksd.unix)' \
--eval '(asdf:make :eksd.unix)' \
--eval '(ql:quickload :eksd/unix)' \
--eval '(asdf:make :eksd/unix)' \
--eval '(quit)'

View File

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
:depends-on ()
:components ((:file "src/eksd")))
(asdf:defsystem "eksd.unix"
(asdf:defsystem "eksd/unix"
:version "0.11"
:license "GPLv3"
:author "Jaidyn Ann <jadedctrl@posteo.at>"
@ -18,6 +18,6 @@
:class asdf:program-system
:build-operation "program-op"
:build-pathname "eksd"
:entry-point "eksd.unix:main"
:entry-point "eksd/unix:main"
:depends-on (:cl-strings :eksd :unix-opts)
:components ((:file "src/unix")))

View File

@ -15,12 +15,12 @@
;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
;; along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
(defpackage :eksd.unix
(defpackage :eksd/unix
(:use :cl :eksd)
(:export :main
*text-table*))
(in-package :eksd.unix)
(in-package :eksd/unix)
;;; —————————————————————————————————————